[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.5.5] do export vmalloc_to_page to modules...
    At 17:29 04/04/02, Ingo Molnar wrote:

    >On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
    > > Both or these aren't really practical once you think it through. Don't
    > > forget that each binary module can be wrapped by an GPL-module which the
    > > kernel cannot do anything at all about and the kernel would never even
    > > know a binary only module was loaded because the GPL module does it.
    > > There is no such thing as security... This kind of thing is already in
    > > use by at least two companies I know of (i.e. using open sourced glue
    > > modules to binary only code) so it is not just a theory I am making
    > > up...
    >there are countries where this might be considered a 'circumvention of a
    >technological measure' that controls access to a work. Law enforcement is
    >not the duty of the copyright holders. There is no such thing as a
    >burglar-safe house either.

    I guess so. Sorry, IANAL and I live in a relatively free country so I
    forgot about that place over the pond... (-:


    "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown
    Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at> (replace at with @)
    Linux NTFS Maintainer / WWW:
    ICQ: 8561279 / WWW:

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.035 / U:0.136 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site