![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 03 Apr 2002 14:48:08 +0200 Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> wrote: > gcc is correct. "&array" and "array" are different. While they represent > the same address, the types are not compatible. Eg. for "int array[5]" > the type of "array" is "int [5]" (decaying to "int *" in most contexts), > but the type of "&array" is "int (*)[5]" (pointer to array of 5 ints). Ah, of course. Thankyou the clue contribution. I should have thought harder in the first place. (To the audience) Patch, of course, is still correct.. Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:22 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||