Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:06:06 +0100 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: Suggestion re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree |
| |
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 08:12:39AM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote: > If you're willing to use BK just as a transport, it's a far more efficient > transport. Ask people who have run rsync/ftp/bk all on the same system, > the BK way gets the same information across in less bits.
If it gets the information across. So far I haven't found any feature in BK to allow restarting a pull or clone once it is interrupted. For that reason I use rsync to get a large BK repo to my home machines, which often is temporarily disconnected from the ISP.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |