lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Suggestion re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 08:12:39AM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> If you're willing to use BK just as a transport, it's a far more efficient
> transport. Ask people who have run rsync/ftp/bk all on the same system,
> the BK way gets the same information across in less bits.

If it gets the information across. So far I haven't found any feature
in BK to allow restarting a pull or clone once it is interrupted.
For that reason I use rsync to get a large BK repo to my home machines,
which often is temporarily disconnected from the ISP.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.110 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site