lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromDaniel Phillips <>
SubjectRe: [OFF TOPIC] BK license change
DateSun, 21 Apr 2002 14:12:16 +0200
On Sunday 21 April 2002 18:57, Larry McVoy wrote:
> I'm considering a change to the BKL which says that N days after a
> changeset is made, that changeset (and its ancestory) must be available
> on a public bk server.  In other words, put a hard limit on how long
> you may hide.

More red tape is usually bad.  You want to do it to protect your commericial
interests?  Fine.  However, the GPL does not need Bitkeeper to be its robocop.
GPL violations have a way of coming to light without this sort of automated
enforcement.

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:25    [W:0.319 / U:0.320 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans