lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...
    Date
    On Monday 22 April 2002 22:57, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 10:42:46PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
    > > On Monday 22 April 2002 22:18, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 08:05:25PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
    > > > > On Monday 22 April 2002 19:52, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > > > > > Should we remove all advertisements from the kernel? A Big Penguin
    > > > > > would probably object to the removal of this printk advertisement
    > > > > > for Swansea:
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4
    > > > > > Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039
    > > > > >
    > > > > > If the answer is no, then you are targetting BitKeeper specifically...
    > > > >
    > > > > Excellent point. If the BitKeeper advertising in the kernel source were
    > > > > held to that level, I would be satisfied.
    > > >
    > > > <chuckle> -- and if that occurred, _I_ would fight to remove it as a
    > > > pointless advertisement.
    > >
    > > You'd want to get rid of the url that points at your docs?
    >
    > "that level" was assuming you were referring to the URL-free printk
    > advertisement I quoted above.

    Oh, I was thinking "a few lines", regardless of content.

    --
    Daniel
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.023 / U:0.188 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site