lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
    Date
    On Sunday 21 April 2002 18:27, Richard Gooch wrote:
    > Daniel Phillips writes:
    > > On Saturday 20 April 2002 18:13, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
    > > > Daniel,
    > > >
    > > > This is not documentation for bitkeeper but how to use bitkeeper
    > > > effectively for kernel development. It happens to be DAMN USEFULL
    > > > documentation at that for anyone wanting to use bitkeeper for kernel
    > > > development so IMO it fully belongs in the kernel. Just like the
    > > > SubmittingPatches document does, too. Or are you going to remove that as well?
    > >
    > > By that logic, we should also include the lkml FAQ in the kernel
    > > tree. Should we?
    >
    > No. A pointer to the lkml FAQ is sufficient.

    Was that a hint? Then certainly, a pointer to the BK documentation would be
    sufficient, and save download bandwidth as well.

    --
    Daniel
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.022 / U:148.312 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site