[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Suggestion re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
    On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 03:54:04AM +1000, CaT wrote:
    > That's what I meant. Email gets sent out to LKML when the patch gets sent
    > to BK for approval by Linus. Another email can then be sent out (unless
    > it's felt that it's too verbose to do so) when Linus accepts it into the
    > tree. (unless I'm missing something about BK ;)

    This doesn't work -- there is no BK _push_ to Linus. There is no "sent
    to BK for approval."

    Traditional RFC822 email is sent to Linus, telling him that there are BK
    changesets to be picked up. A human-defined length of time ensues,
    after which Linus either ignores or comments on the email, and either
    does a 'bk pull' or not.

    Very similar to the way GNU patches are handled, strangely enough ;-)


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.022 / U:37.064 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site