[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
    On Sunday 21 April 2002 18:26, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
    > On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > > Daniel was trying to dictate what we can and cannot talk about, in the
    > > kernel sources. That's offensive.
    > The reason of my email is completely different. It's just after you said
    > the word "offensive" I remembered some tale whereby a sheep was trying to
    > argue with the wolves and the wolves were trying to pretend the sheep has
    > the same rights but after a while they got so annoyed that they told the
    > sheep "you are really rude and offensive" and ate it justifying it as
    > a "self-defence".
    > How can a sheep argue with the wolves (even if they themselves used to be
    > sheep not so long ago but now having become wolves are quite happy with
    > their position). There are two solutions: 1. for a sheep to be promoted
    > into the status of a wolf or 2. for a sheep to be eaten. Daniel, which one
    > seems more desirable?

    Heh. Neither alternative is 'appetizing' ;-)

    Following my personal dictates, I'll try not to become part of the problem.
    I think I prefer to be a vegetarian wolf.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.021 / U:15.812 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site