Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sun, 21 Apr 2002 10:40:46 -0700 | | From | Larry McVoy <> | | Subject | Re: Suggestion re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree |
| |
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 03:16:29AM +1000, CaT wrote: > On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 11:02:04PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > That would actually make the development process MORE open than it was > > > before BK, and might make even non-BK people appreciate BK more simply > > > because there is a real point to it. > > > > Well, it would be more like working in a fishbowl anyway. The part that's > > missing is the discussion. Just looking at the recent traffic... there's > > Ok. I admit I haven't read through the entire thread. It's a wee bit big > and painful so excuse me if this has already been suggested but... If > this is the biggest (or one of the biggest) sticking points then why not > get BK to email the lk mailing list when there's a patch submitted with
I can certainly do this for the tree on bkbits.net, i.e., it emails the lk list when it gets new work. Linus? -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |