Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: Suggestion re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree | Date | Sat, 20 Apr 2002 19:50:14 +0200 |
| |
On Sunday 21 April 2002 19:40, Larry McVoy wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 03:16:29AM +1000, CaT wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 11:02:04PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > > That would actually make the development process MORE open than it was > > > > before BK, and might make even non-BK people appreciate BK more simply > > > > because there is a real point to it. > > > > > > Well, it would be more like working in a fishbowl anyway. The part that's > > > missing is the discussion. Just looking at the recent traffic... there's > > > > Ok. I admit I haven't read through the entire thread. It's a wee bit big > > and painful so excuse me if this has already been suggested but... If > > this is the biggest (or one of the biggest) sticking points then why not > > get BK to email the lk mailing list when there's a patch submitted with > > I can certainly do this for the tree on bkbits.net, i.e., it emails the > lk list when it gets new work. Linus?
Horse, barn. We need a solution that works before the patch gets applied.
Perhaps that's what you're talking about?
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |