lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
    Date
    On Sunday 21 April 2002 18:32, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 02:04:07AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
    > Since Linus uses BK, and the document is there in the first place
    > to make life easier, Daniel is therefore making life more difficult
    > because of ideology, and no other reason.

    Yup, that's me. No, I don't always check my conscience at the door. If
    that were my habit I'd have spent the past three years comfortably
    programming big, expensive machines under Windows.

    N.B., not implying you're morally bankrupt, no suggestion of that at
    all. Still, since you just dumps on all those who prefer to follow
    their hearts, you deserve to be publically challenged.

    Let's pull back a little from the proselytizing, shall we? I'll modify
    my proposal to 'include just a pointer to the bk documentation in the
    kernel tree itself'. This should satisfy everybody.

    --
    Daniel
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:4.183 / U:0.152 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site