Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree | Date | Sat, 20 Apr 2002 18:46:11 +0200 |
| |
On Sunday 21 April 2002 18:32, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 02:04:07AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Since Linus uses BK, and the document is there in the first place > to make life easier, Daniel is therefore making life more difficult > because of ideology, and no other reason.
Yup, that's me. No, I don't always check my conscience at the door. If that were my habit I'd have spent the past three years comfortably programming big, expensive machines under Windows.
N.B., not implying you're morally bankrupt, no suggestion of that at all. Still, since you just dumps on all those who prefer to follow their hearts, you deserve to be publically challenged.
Let's pull back a little from the proselytizing, shall we? I'll modify my proposal to 'include just a pointer to the bk documentation in the kernel tree itself'. This should satisfy everybody.
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |