lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Date
On Sunday 21 April 2002 01:15, Kenneth Johansson wrote:
> Daniel Phillips wrote:
>
> > My conclusion: though there are more BK patches being applied to Linus's
> > tree than non-BK, they are generating less discussion on lkml than non-BK
> > patches do. Or to put it bluntly: BK patches are not being discussed.
>
> I think your conclusion is wrong and there has always gone patches directly to
> Linus even before BK. With BK we can actually see who did what and often why so if
> something gets in that should not we know who to blame. If anything this should
> make people think one extra time before hitting the send button.

Good point. Perhaps we extend this idea to: A patch goes into the tree that
really should have been discussed but wasn't, now we know who to beat up.
Err, like the BK documentation patch.

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans