Messages in this thread |  | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree | | Date | Sat, 20 Apr 2002 19:05:40 +0200 |
| |
On Sunday 21 April 2002 01:15, Kenneth Johansson wrote: > Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > My conclusion: though there are more BK patches being applied to Linus's > > tree than non-BK, they are generating less discussion on lkml than non-BK > > patches do. Or to put it bluntly: BK patches are not being discussed. > > I think your conclusion is wrong and there has always gone patches directly to > Linus even before BK. With BK we can actually see who did what and often why so if > something gets in that should not we know who to blame. If anything this should > make people think one extra time before hitting the send button.
Good point. Perhaps we extend this idea to: A patch goes into the tree that really should have been discussed but wasn't, now we know who to beat up. Err, like the BK documentation patch.
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |