Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 21 Apr 2002 18:05:43 +0100 | From | Anton Altaparmakov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree |
| |
Hi,
At 17:46 21/04/02, Jochen Friedrich wrote: > > >Wrong. Many corporate firewalls allow email and http (both via proxy) and > > >reject any other traffic. CVS and BK are both unusable in this > > >environment. > > > > Not wrong. BK works fine over http protocol. CVS is another matter which I > > cannot comment on... > >Ok, but there are other scenarios where only email is available (often via >mail gateways like softswitch on os/390)...
Then use BK over email then (to submit a patch of your last change set for example you would do "bk export -tpatch -r+", and the receiving end does a simple "cat emailmessagetext | bk receive" and that's it done.
Obviously you haven't looked at bitkeeper... (-;
Anton
ps. You better be prepared to accept very large emails if you want to send a whole linux kernel repository by email though! Never mind if you are using bitkeeper or just a tar ball!
-- "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cantab.net> (replace at with @) Linux NTFS Maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.openprojects.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |