[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
    Daniel Phillips wrote:

    > My conclusion: though there are more BK patches being applied to Linus's
    > tree than non-BK, they are generating less discussion on lkml than non-BK
    > patches do. Or to put it bluntly: BK patches are not being discussed.

    I think your conclusion is wrong and there has always gone patches directly to
    Linus even before BK. With BK we can actually see who did what and often why so if
    something gets in that should not we know who to blame. If anything this should
    make people think one extra time before hitting the send button.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.020 / U:20.996 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site