Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:30:24 +0200 | | From | Stelian Pop <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree |
| |
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 12:01:35AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> My conclusion: though there are more BK patches being applied to Linus's > tree than non-BK, they are generating less discussion on lkml than non-BK > patches do. Or to put it bluntly: BK patches are not being discussed.
Or maybe using a SCM puts more pressure on the developper which writes better code, which will get accepted with less discussion.
In general, when you seek discussion with a quick and dirty piece of code, you post a patch, not the BK equivalent, since you know this will not get accepted anyway...
Stelian. -- Stelian Pop <stelian.pop@fr.alcove.com> Alcove - http://www.alcove.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |