lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
    On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 02:04:07AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
    > kernel development with bk requires net access and so it's sufficient,
    > when it's available over the net. On the other hand SubmittingPatches
    > describes the lowest common denominator, which works with any SCM and
    > doesn't favour any of them.

    Huh? BK requires no more net access than you require when submitting
    a regular patch. You need to be connected to move the bits. Working
    disconnected is one of the things BK does best, compare it to any other
    tool and you can do far more with BK unconnected, simply because BK
    takes the history with you.
    --
    ---
    Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.031 / U:61.312 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site