Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 02 Apr 2002 15:11:07 +0200 (CEST) | Subject | Re: Request for 2.4.20 to be a non-trivial-bugfixes-only version | From | Rene Rebe <> |
| |
Hi.
I think that you used exactly the worser kernels between the good ones ... ;-) 2.4.16 was really good and 2.4.18 is, too. 2.4.19-pre5 looks also very promissing, so far.
On: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 08:07:12 -0300, Pablo Alcaraz <pabloa@laotraesquina.com.ar> wrote: > mtopper@xarch.tu-graz.ac.at wrote: > > >>...I have been looking for the 'good' > >>kernel for a while: trying 2.4.6, 2.4.8, 2.4.15, 2.4.17, 2.4.18rc1 -- I'm > >>starting to wonder when it might get here. > >> > > > >Personally, 2.4.16 works like a charm for me. I guess I'm the only one, am > >I? :-) > > > > > >- > >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > > > > > I use 2.4.16 kernel for my production machines and I love it (well, swap > a bit with 256mb ram, but it's right with 1gb, 128mb, 512mb, 32mb, > etc... 256mb is a bad number for its vm I think)
k33p h4ck1n6 René
-- René Rebe (Registered Linux user: #248718 <http://counter.li.org>)
eMail: rene.rebe@gmx.net rene@rocklinux.org
Homepage: http://drocklinux.dyndns.org/rene/
Anyone sending unwanted advertising e-mail to this address will be charged $25 for network traffic and computing time. By extracting my address from this message or its header, you agree to these terms.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |