![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Friday 19 April 2002 09:43, Ingo Molnar wrote: > On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Dieter [iso-8859-15] Nützel wrote: > > No uptodate O(1) patch for 2.4. Very sad. So there isn't any change to > > see a current preemption patch on top of vm33 and O(1). > > > > [...] > > I'm under the impression that "all" development is focused on 2.5.x, now. > > well, 2.5's scheduler bits were pretty much in flux in the past two months > or so, partly due to the preemption feature going in. And there are a > number of other changes in the pipeline as well. So what makes sense for > 2.4 is Robert's plan: to backport O(1)+preempt once 2.5 is slowing down, > that way we get the proper testing of both components, instead of a > separated scheduler patch that doesnt even exist in that form in 2.5. Thank you very much for your answer Ingo. It was somewhat still around you. So I was not sure if we have to be worry about you. OK, you are fine. Regards, Dieter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:25 [W:0.534 / U:0.280 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||