![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Friday 19 April 2002 07:37, George J Karabin wrote: > Confusing as it may be to non-USB developers, how about using the USB > spec terms "host" (for the PC) and "local host" (for the USB > gadget/client/device/etc...)? I haven't seen those specific terms > suggested yet after quickly searching through the archive. > > For shorthand, you might use "h" and "lh" suffixes, i.e., "usbh" for > host code, and "usblh" for local host code. Or something else if that > seems too terse. > > One well placed Readme file ought to make the distinction pretty clear > to most end users, and USB developers shouldn't find it a problem at > all. Too short a difference. You easily skip it reading and there's a chance of typos. Furthermore the first latter should differ for tab completion. Target is actually quite good a name. It makes clear that there's only one initiator of transactions on USB. Regards Oliver - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:25 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||