[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] 2.5.8 sort kernel tables
    On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 16:52:29 +0100, 
    Russell King <> wrote:
    >On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 01:38:59AM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
    >> For example, arm #defines get8_unaligned_check which uses __ex_table.
    >This doesn't cause your issue though. Its only used from code built into
    >the kernel .text segment, never from any other segment. It isn't a
    >#define in some random header file that may end up in the .init segment

    You are missing the point. There are several macros that use
    __ex_table. Unless it can be guaranteed that no current or future use
    of *any* of those macros will be in an __init section then we must not
    assume that the exception table is sorted.

    Exception table is not the only one that is assumed to be sorted,
    get8_unaligned_check is not the only macro that uses __ex_table. Both
    are examples of tables and code where we assume, but do not validate, a
    sorted table.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.022 / U:8.116 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site