![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 04:20:58PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > > I won't scream too loud, but I think it's pretty much done right as is. > > Regardless if that's the cleaner implementation or not, I don't see > much the point of merging those cleanups in 2.4 right now: it won't > make any functional difference to users and it's only a self contained > code cleanup, Thats exactly why they can be merged easily: They are self contained code cleanups, as you said. > while other patches that make a runtime difference aren't merged yet. They aren't merged yet because they are intrusive and, in your case (-aa VM patches), they are not obviously correct and are hard to understand. We're making progress, though. The writeout scheduling changes (which were easy for me to understand) have been merged already. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:25 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||