Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 8 Apr 2002 20:35:16 +0000 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: implementing soft-updates |
| |
Hi
> > The background fsck capability, just like journalling or logging, are > > typically only in needed in 24/7 systems (sure, they are nice to have in > > your home system, but do you _REALLY_ need them? i don't!) and those > > system typically are run on proven hardware which is operated well > > within the specs. So please don't construct these kinds of arguments. > > You can already do background fsck on a linux system today. Just do it on > a LVM/EVMS snapshot.
How do you fix errors you find by such background fsck? Pavel -- Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt, details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |