lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: implementing soft-updates
Hi!

> I'm just tired of this: "Back when I used to use Linux 2.1.44 my
> disks were trashed so bad that I lost everything! So use BSD."
> Last time I checked, BSD fsck didn't have a set of regression tests
> like ext2 fsck does. On the BSD mailing lists you can read about
> fsck getting signal 11. So it's not God's Glorious Filesystem by
> any means.

Actually, I believe I can make current e2fsck mark filesystem clean when
it is not [by trashing disk badly and killing lost+found]. If you can mail
me recent [static] e2fsck, I can test it and create image where it fails.

Pavel
--
Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt,
details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.192 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site