Messages in this thread | | | From | Keith Owens <> | Subject | Re: RAID superblock confusion | Date | Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:42:20 +1000 |
| |
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 19:41:11 -0700, Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com> wrote: >Then you'd just need to make sure that if there are any block modules linked >into the kernel that raid is also linked into the kernle instead of a module. > >Is there some reason why this wouldn't work (except for CML1 >complications...)? > >Kieth, will kbuild2.5 affect this in any way? Or is this entirely a CML2 >thing?
AFAICT it is pure config. kbuild 2.5 does not care how .config is built, it just requires a clean .config. I want a clean seperation between configuring and building the kernel. In particular, Makefile rules should not try to adjust for broken config entries, this is a config only problem.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |