![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Well, shortly put, the -ac tree is much more -pre than the -pre patches are. Using -ac patches is jumping ahead of the -pre patches normally. -d Adam McKenna wrote: >On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 07:37:03PM -0400, David Ford wrote: > >>Not at all. >> >>Alan's most recent patch is in line with the 2.4.19 series of patches, >>these are pre patches to the upcoming 2.4.19. >> > >Right, but (as far as I know) 2.4.19-pre6 is not considered the "stable linux >kernel", is it? So how could 2.4.19-pre5-ac3 be the latest -ac patch to the >stable linux kernel? It's more like "the latest -ac patch to the latest >prepatch for the stable linux kernel". > >What I'm really complaining about is that for people who don't like to use >-pre kernels (like me), finger@finger.kernel.org is useless for finding out >what the latest -ac patch is to a non-pre kernel. > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||