[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Interprocess shared memory .... but file backed?
    Followup to:  <>
    By author: Christopher Quinn <>
    In newsgroup:
    > > well MAP_PRIVATE is "dont share" so not with that 8)
    > > Use MAP_SHARED and you'll get what you want
    > >
    > Certainly true! But MAP_SHARED gives uncontrolled flush of
    > dirty data - so that's out for me. I only want 'privacy' to
    > extend to the right to make changes permanent at my own
    > discretion.

    I actually have this issue as well, in order to make LPSM sharable it
    would be greatly beneficial to have something that would allow
    multiple processes to see the same mmap, but for writes not to hit the
    backing store file.

    <> at work, <> in private!
    "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." <>
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.024 / U:6.296 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site