lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?
    On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > Rik van Riel wrote:
    > > On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Jonathan A. George wrote:

    > > 4) distributed repositories
    > >
    > > 5) ability to exchange changesets by email
    >
    > These can probably be in version 2...

    Actually, I doubt Linus would let us use his repository,
    aside from the scalability problems you get with 2000
    people trying to use the same repository... ;)

    > 1: If I have two changesets applied to a file, and I make a change to
    > that file, which changeset is it to be associated with?

    > 2: The ability to move a set of changes from one changeset into
    > another one. ie: split that damn patch up!

    Could be solved with branches, but that's not too clean
    either. Splitting up patches is a hard problem ...

    > But as a starting point I'd say: changesets as a first-class-concept,
    > and lots of integration with tkdiff.

    Agreed, changesets, branches and merging are the first
    priority.

    regards,

    Rik
    --
    <insert bitkeeper endorsement here>

    http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:4.106 / U:0.172 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site