Messages in this thread | | | From | "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <> | Subject | Re: Why not an arch mirror for the kernel? | Date | Thu, 7 Mar 2002 17:12:12 +0000 (UTC) |
| |
Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> writes:
>And why Arch and not subversion? Subversion has more people working on >it, Collab has put a pile of money into it, it has the Apache guy working >on it, and Arch has one guy with no money and a pile of shell scripts. >Come on. There is nothing free in this life, if one guy and some hacking >could solve this problem, it would have been solved long ago.
One of the most important reasons why packages like CVS, RCS (and SCCS and I do intend the pun. ;-) ) don't die is C-x C-q and the vc package.
The fact that bk is SCCS compatible here is IMHO one of the really big positive points.
Regards Henning
-- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- Geschaeftsfuehrer INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH hps@intermeta.de
Am Schwabachgrund 22 Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0 info@intermeta.de D-91054 Buckenhof Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |