lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers
FromAndi Kleen <>
Date06 Mar 2002 10:40:44 +0100
Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au> writes:

> The Open Source Club at The Ohio State University wrote:
> > 
> > [ succinctness ]
> >
> 
> fwiw, I prefer to not use bitkeeper, for the reasons which
> you outline.

I also prefer not to use Bitkeeper as long as possible for similar reasons 
and because it is too slow and clumpsy 
(although it is already very hard because often source is only available 
through it, e.g. for ppc or for 2.5 pre patches now -- hopefully this trend
does not continue)

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:21    [from the cache]
©2003-2008