Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 6 Mar 2002 18:35:16 -0800 | From | Petro <> | Subject | Re: [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers |
| |
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 03:46:04PM -0500, Mark Mielke wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 03:14:19PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > Followup to: <20020305230143.GB5538@matchmail.com> > If BK meets all the requirements, and no other product does, then don't > give it a second thought, or a second post. I don't know what BK offers,
We used to use it here, and it rocked. We just couldn't afford to use it any more, and that sucked.
CVS is a piss poor alternative.
I miss bitkeeper, and I didn't even use it all that heavily.
-- Share and Enjoy. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |