lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[NFS] Re: vfs_unlink() >=2.5.5-pre1 question
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002, Alexander Viro wrote:

> a) d_delete() being called too early in vfs_unlink(). Not a big
> deal, it's easy to move outside of dget()/dput().

Indeed, that worked just fine. I ran Bill Hawes' fs-test scripts in
ext2, ext3 and tmpfs after doing so, and nothing interesting happened.

When I ran them in a knfsd loopback mounted ext2 fs however, a couple
of gripes popped out.

nfs_safe_remove: dir1/.nfs00009d5000000b6e busy, d_count=2
nfs_safe_remove: dir2/.nfs00009d5d00000c40 busy, d_count=2

-Mike

For reference:

--- linux-2.5.7/fs/namei.c.org Sat Mar 30 12:54:29 2002
+++ linux-2.5.7/fs/namei.c Sun Mar 31 05:59:24 2002
@@ -1466,16 +1466,15 @@
down(&dentry->d_inode->i_sem);
if (d_mountpoint(dentry))
error = -EBUSY;
- else {
+ else
error = dir->i_op->unlink(dir, dentry);
- if (!error)
- d_delete(dentry);
- }
up(&dentry->d_inode->i_sem);
dput(dentry);

- if (!error)
+ if (!error) {
+ d_delete(dentry);
inode_dir_notify(dir, DN_DELETE);
+ }

return error;
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.047 / U:0.680 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site