lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Filesystem benchmarks: ext2 vs ext3 vs jfs vs minix
From
Date
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 05:54, Matthew Kirkwood wrote:
>
> 3. The journalled filesystems do have measurable overhead
> for this workload.

Can you repeat the tests with XFS too?

In my tests, it did the best for database-type workloads (and generally,
for large files with multiple access).

--
Florin Andrei

"Sorry judge, we would like to publish the file formats, but the data is
not stored in files. It is stored in a database that is an indivisible
part of the operating system." - a potential future Microsoft excuse

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.025 / U:1.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site