lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] devexit fixes in i82092.c
From
Date
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com> writes:

>
> (thinking vaguely long-term)
>
> I wonder if mochel already code for this, or has thought about this... Just like
>
> suspend, IMO we ideally should use the device tree to shutdown the system,
> agreed?
>
> Further, I wonder if the reboot/shutdown notifiers can be replaced with device
> tree control over those events...

Please for the Linux booting Linux scenario it is mandatory we get this right
for reboot. I know for a fact that currently we leave active receive buffers on
network cards when we reboot. (If you haven't downed the interface). So it
is possible for a network packet to come in and hose a machine that is rebooting.

Occasionally I test my linux booting linux code by loading memtest86 to make certain
I don't have something like that going on. And the first time I tried it I hadn't
downed the interfaces and I actually saw a network packet come in and corrupt
memory. I also have similar reports from other about disk subsystems.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans