[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.4.18 scheduler bugs
    > > moment work for them becomes available.  I see no reason why an idle cpu
    > > should be forced to remain idle until the next tick, nor why fixing that
    > > should be considered `broken'.
    > performance. IPIs are expensive.

    On a PIII I can see this being the case, especially as they dont power save
    on hlt nowdays. But on the Athlon the IPI isnt going down a little side
    channel between cpus.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.023 / U:1.436 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site