[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] struct super_block cleanup - msdos/vfat
On 15 March 2002 09:27, Alexander Viro wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > Does this mean umsdos can be layered atop of wider range of filesystems
> > than just msdos? That would be cool.
> Yes, but what's cool about it? If not for the fact that there are weird
> setups that actually use umsdos (i.e. compatibility reasons), the best
> way to deal with it would be rm -rf... If underlying filesystem has
> normal semantics - you don't need anything, if it doesn't... I'd suggest
> to use combination of tar(1) and ramfs. At least that way you get full
> Unix semantics - no mess with rename breaking links, etc.

Well, I initially come here from DOS/Win world and in fact actually used
umsdos for some time (heck, it's still installed on one abandoned box).
But I presume there are other worlds (maybe Mac?) with filesystems unsuited
for Linux root fs (like fat), why invent u[fs] for them too?

OTOH it means extra effort in umsdos rewrite, and since I don't do that
effort, I'd better shut up now.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.044 / U:5.436 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site