[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Cleanup port 0x80 use (was: Re: IO delay ...)
    > I am still wondering, though, why this method of getting a delay
    > is used so often. IMO in most places one could use udelay(1) instead,
    > with much less risk of doing wrong.

    udelay(1) I don't believe is enough. Unfortunately I can't find my
    documentation on the ISA bus which covers the timeout for acknowledging an
    address cycle. Otherwise for tsc capable boxes I agree entirely.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.019 / U:6.272 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site