lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] Re: Node affine NUMA scheduler
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Gerrit Huizenga wrote:

> Beware of optimizing for the benchmark. In real life, exec is likely
> a much better place for the balancing.

:-) Thanks for the warning. I'll play around with the possibilities by (at
least temporarilly) including a node_policy or balance_policy. I'm having
in mind some big OpenMP codes which could benefit of initial balancing
which they won't get in do_exec().

Regards,
Erich


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.106 / U:0.332 seconds]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site