[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing
    Richard Gooch wrote:

    >Hans Reiser writes:
    >>Itai Nahshon wrote:
    >>>On Sunday 10 March 2002 10:36, Hans Reiser wrote:
    >>>>I think that if version control becomes as simple as turning on a plugin
    >>>>for a directory or file, and then adding a little to the end of a
    >>>>filename to see and list the old versions, Mom can use it.
    >>>IIRC that was a feature in systems from DEC even before
    >>>VMS (I'm talking about the late 70's). eg. file.txt;2 was revision 2
    >>>of file.txt.
    >>Was it easy? Did people like it? Any lessons/successes?
    >Mostly I found it an inconvenience. When playing with big files (say
    >around 1 MiB), you had to remember to purge periodically. I can't
    >recall being grateful that this feature existed.
    >Certainly, when I switched to Unix, I didn't miss file versioning.
    >I question how useful it really is, except in certain specialised
    >applications (like SCM, where we have tools to fit the job).
    > Regards,
    > Richard....
    So the problem was that it was not optional?


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.023 / U:6.252 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site