[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: directory notifications lost after fork?
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 01:59:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> My patch makes directory notifiers per thread group instead of per process
> tree (which they are now).

I overlooked that in your patch you changed the index for the lookup, so
yes, that looks a better fix.

> This would be equivalent to returning -EPERM if you tried to remove a
> lock on a file when you didn't set it ...

Lock are standard and we cannot change such API, but for a fairly new
API I'd prefer strict stuff. Anyways now -EPERM would be wrong and the
need of the errorback is also lower because there's no risk of
collisions anymore, now different current->files will be able to get
different notifiers, so if something it should be a -ENOENT, it's not a
matter of permissions/ownership anymore.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.033 / U:8.040 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site