Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Antwort: Re: Kernel Hangs 2.4.16 on heay io Oracle and Tivolie TSM | From | Oliver.Schersand@BASF-IT- ... | Date | Mon, 11 Mar 2002 09:16:04 +0100 |
| |
Hi,
i have switch to kernel 2.2.19. But after about 5 day's ( Friday ) i had a the same hang on the system. which leads me to the diagnostic that we have a possible hardware problem or a problem in the compaq smart array or compaq 5300 Raid Array controller driver. On 2.2.19 i have cpqarray 1.0.12 and cciss 1.0.4. On the 2.4.16 kernel i have the cpqarray 2.4.5 and the cciss 2.4.6.
Kinds Regards
Oliver Schersand
---------------------- Weitergeleitet von Oliver Schersand/BCS/BASF am 11.03.2002 08:43 ---------------------------
"James Washer" <washer@us.ibm.com> am 09.03.2002 00:07:07
An: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com> Kopie: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>, Oliver Schersand/BCS/BASF@EUROPE, Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@oracle.com>, use-oracle@suse.com, suse-linux-e@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thema: Re: Antwort: Re: Kernel Hangs 2.4.16 on heay io Oracle and Tivolie TSM
Chris,
I just took a look at what little information I have available on this situation.. Namely the 'block-o-oops' from many ps processes..
I'm not sure I agree with you that it is a race in proc code. There are several ps processes that oops'd over a period of 58 seconds. My guess is that there is (was) a process out there that has a corrupt p->sig (== 0x00003296). Hence, each time the user runs ps, the new ps trips over the same corrupt task.
What really confuses me is what any of this has to do with the original complaint about the system hanging.. Has that behaviour gone away?
- jim
Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>@vger.kernel.org on 03/05/2002 09:06:43 AM
Sent by: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>, Oliver.Schersand@BASF-IT-Services.com cc: Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@oracle.com>, use-oracle@suse.com, suse-linux-e@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Antwort: Re: Kernel Hangs 2.4.16 on heay io Oracle and Tivolie TSM
On Monday, March 04, 2002 06:07:19 PM +0300 Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> wrote:
> Wasn't 2.4.16 the known unstable vm release of 2.4? Why do you go to > such effort to stick with a bad kernel? Go to 2.4.18.
I'm not sure exactly which vm problems you mean, but He's running the suse 2.4.16, which is heavily patched. When your running big production databases, upgrading to the kernel of the week isn't an option.
I think we've found the bug, it looks like a race in the proc code.
Oliver, someone will contact you a little later with instructions on getting a kernel with the fix. If you only see this oops during backups, make sure you aren't trying to backup /proc.
-chris
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |