[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] New locking primitive for 2.5

    Now, before we go further, can people explain _why_ we want this?

    If something is getting a lot of short contention as a semaphore, maybe
    it's just broken locking. Let's not work around it with a new locking
    primitive just because we can.

    What is the _existing_ problem this is trying to solve, and why?


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.019 / U:6.760 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site