lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: The IBM order relaxation patch
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> > This looks hard to fix with the current mm layer. Maybe Rik's
> > rmap method could help here, because with reverse mappings we
> > can at least try to free adjacent areas (because we then at least
> > *know* who's using the pages).
>
> Yes, that's one of leading reasons for wanting rmap. (Number one and
> two reasons are: allow forcible unmapping of multiply referenced pages
> for swapout; get more reliable hardware ref bit readings.)

It's still on my TODO list. Patches are very much welcome
though ;)

Rik
--
"Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS"
-- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.059 / U:0.620 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site