[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: The IBM order relaxation patch
    On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, David S. Miller wrote:
    > BTW, in checking this out it seems current->allocation_order is only
    > set and never checked anywhere.

    Yes, the "local_pages" interaction between __free_pages_ok and
    balance_classzone is in a half-baked state in the mainline tree,
    I think Linus backed out some of what Andrea intended: the -aa tree
    makes more sense there (where "allocation_order" is "local_pages.order").


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.020 / U:0.216 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site