Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:32:00 -0200 (BRST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing |
| |
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Florian Weimer wrote: > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> writes: > > > The long-range plan, and the real payoff, comes if main developers start > > using bk too, which should make syncing a lot easier. That will take some > > time, I suspect. > > Do you think that at some point, using BitKeeper will become mandatory > for subsystem maintainers? ("mandatory" in the sense that > non-BitKeeper input is dealt with in a less timely fashion, for > example.)
They're pretty much equally easy to deal with, except that the bitkeeper patches will always apply and will get better changelog entries ;)
regards,
Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |