![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> The /dev/epoll patch is good, but the interface is different enough > from /dev/poll that ircd would need a new engine_epoll.c anyway. > (It would look like a cross between engine_devpoll.c and engine_rtsig.c, > as it would need to be notified by os_linux.c of any EWOULDBLOCK return values. > Both rtsigs and /dev/epoll only provide 'I just became ready' notification, > but no 'I'm not ready anymore' notification.) I don't understand what it is you're saying here. The ircu server uses non-blocking sockets, and has since long before EfNet and Undernet branched, so it already handles EWOULDBLOCK or EAGAIN intelligently, as far as I know. -- Kevin L. Mitchell <klmitch@mit.edu> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:23 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||