Messages in this thread | | | From | David Woodhouse <> | Subject | Re: recalc_sigpending() / recalc_sigpending_tsk() ? | Date | Thu, 28 Feb 2002 18:26:58 +0000 |
| |
torvalds@transmeta.com said: > Not a chance in hell. The backwards compatibility looks like a > trivial one-liner:
> compat-2.4.h: > #define recalc_sigpending() recalc_sigpending(current)
> so what are you complaining about?
Fine. I was trying to define a back-compat version of recalc_sigpending_tsk() too, before going through all the code and changing recalc_sigpending(current) to recalc_sigpending and recalc_sigpending(other) to recalc_sigpending_tsk() - but as you rightly point out there's no justification for using the latter in any of the driver or fs code that I'm trying to support - and hence it isn't present, and doesn't need the compat support.
-- dwmw2
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |