lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: recalc_sigpending() / recalc_sigpending_tsk() ?
    Date

    torvalds@transmeta.com said:
    > Not a chance in hell. The backwards compatibility looks like a
    > trivial one-liner:

    > compat-2.4.h:
    > #define recalc_sigpending() recalc_sigpending(current)

    > so what are you complaining about?

    Fine. I was trying to define a back-compat version of recalc_sigpending_tsk()
    too, before going through all the code and changing recalc_sigpending(current)
    to recalc_sigpending and recalc_sigpending(other) to recalc_sigpending_tsk()
    - but as you rightly point out there's no justification for using the latter
    in any of the driver or fs code that I'm trying to support - and hence it
    isn't present, and doesn't need the compat support.


    --
    dwmw2


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:20    [W:7.374 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site