lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromDavid Woodhouse <>
SubjectRe: recalc_sigpending() / recalc_sigpending_tsk() ?
DateThu, 28 Feb 2002 18:26:58 +0000
torvalds@transmeta.com said:
>  Not a chance in hell. The backwards compatibility looks like a
> trivial one-liner:

>    compat-2.4.h:
> 	#define recalc_sigpending() recalc_sigpending(current)

> so what are you complaining about? 

Fine. I was trying to define a back-compat version of recalc_sigpending_tsk()
too, before going through all the code and changing recalc_sigpending(current)
to recalc_sigpending and recalc_sigpending(other) to recalc_sigpending_tsk() 
- but as you rightly point out there's no justification for using the latter
in any of the driver or fs code that I'm trying to support - and hence it
isn't present, and doesn't need the compat support.


--
dwmw2


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:20    [from the cache]
©2003-2008