lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Lightweight userspace semaphores...
    On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 10:53:11AM -0500, Hubertus Franke wrote:
    > As stated above, I allocate a kernel object <kulock_t> on demand and
    > hash it. This way I don't have to pin any user address. What does everybody
    > think about the merit of this approach versus the pinning approach?
    [...]
    > In your case, can the lock be allocated at different
    > virtual addresses in the various address spaces.

    I think this is a relatively important feature. It may not be
    possible to use the same virtual address in different processes.


    r~
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:21    [W:0.199 / U:0.628 seconds]
    ©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site