Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 27 Feb 2002 12:31:01 -0800 (PST) | From | Raghu Angadi <> | Subject | Re: Fw: memory corruption in tcp bind hash buckets on SMP? |
| |
--- kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote: > Hello! > > > inverted order of insertion into the lists in tw_hashdance() is probably > > cleaner fix than inverted order of removal.. > > Why are they not equivalent? Good question? :-)
they are. with "if (!tb->tb) return;" instead of "if (!tb->pprev) return;". silly me was thinking of literal cut-n-paste invertion of the oder :->
> Alexey
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion! http://greetings.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |