Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 Feb 2002 18:53:31 +0100 | From | Martin Dalecki <> | Subject | Re: ext3 and undeletion |
| |
Rose, Billy wrote: > "So the pain for the sysadmin will certainly not be decreased." > > My company can tolerate 0% loss of data (which is why I raised this issue). > The sysadmin's pain would be standing in the unemployment line if a file > could not be recovered (which is currently from a heap of tapes that may > take many hours to locate). The issue is not an easier job, but data > integrity. Any sysadmin would state that every user at some point in time > will delete something that is critical. Hell, I've done it myself on my own > workstation after staring at the screen for 15 hours on a Saturday. The > ability to handle situations like a file going "poof" is why my company will > not use Linux on these particular file servers. My aim was to change that by > crushing the only thing holding Netware in my company.
Ever tought of adding some *archiving* features to samba - fully transparent to the users and still no need to mess around with the kernel? And last but not least - much easier to implement correctly, if the only thing you wan't is to crash netware...
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |