Messages in this thread | | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.4.18 - Full tarball is OK | Date | 25 Feb 2002 14:40:31 -0800 |
| |
Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0202251931360.7820-100000@imladris.surriel.com> By author: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > > If so Marcelo can you put up 2.4.18-fixed patch and a borked-fixed diff ? > That would break hpa's incremental diff patches. > If somebody needs 2.4.18 + fix, they can just run 2.4.18-rc4. >
Since the tarball apparently is OK and it's only the patch that's different, just re-create the patch, put it in the proper place, and make sure the file date on the patch is different; the incremental diff will be regenerated to match.
-hpa -- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <amsp@zytor.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |